Review Archives

1 | 2 | 3

Today's Date is:

The English Patient


Reviewed by: Charles Tashiro
Genre: Drama
Video: Letterboxed 1.85:1
Audio: Dolby digital
Language: English
Subtitle: Spanish
Length: 167 minutes
Rating: R
Release Date: 3-24-98
Studio: Miramax
Commentary: None
Documentaries: None
Featurettes: None
Filmography/Biography: None
Interviews: None
Trailers/TV Spots: None
Alternate/Deleted Scenes: None
Music Video: None
Other: None
Cast and Crew: Ralph Fiennes, Kristin Scott Thomas, Juliette Binoche, Willem Dafoe, Naveen Andrews, Colin Firth, J¸rgen Prochnow; director of photography, John Seale; production design by Stuart Craig
Screenplay by: Anthony Minghella, based on the novel by Michael Ondaatje
Produced by: Saul Zaentz
Directed By: Anthony Minghella
Music: Gabriel Yared
The Review: Sumptuously, even immaculately produced, "The English Patient" begins hauntingly as the delicate brushstrokes of a watercolor brush slowly trace a figure on rice paper. Shot close enough to see the texture of the paper, the shot gradually dissolves into the dunes of the North African desert seen from above. Accompanied by the plaintive voice of a woman singing in Hungarian, a bi-plane slowly glides into frame, carrying the protagonist, Count Almásy (Ralph Fiennes), and the love of his life, Katherine Clifton (Kirstin Scott Thomas). As the credits finish, their plane is shot down by a group of German soldiers, crashing in the desert, apparently two more victims of World War II. The story then jumps forward as Fiennes, the mysterious "English patient," hideously disfigured by the flames that engulfed the crashed airplane, is cared for by a Canadian nurse (Juliette Binoche). As he tells her more and more about his life, the film goes into flashback, and we learn about his tragic affair with Thomas. Binoche, who is herself recovering from the loss of her lover and best friend, is gradually brought back to life by her ministrations to Fiennes and by the attentions of an Indian soldier (Naveen Andrews) serving in the British army. It is clear from the beginning that the "English patient" (so called because he was brought to an English hospital by a group of Bedouins who wrongly assumed he was of that nationality) has something to conceal. Much of the film is spent working up to his revelation. We begin to get hints of the trouble when another Canadian, Caravaggio (Willem Defoe) arrives. Consumed with a barely concealed hostility to the patient, Caravaggio eventually reveals the reasons for his bitterness. Maimed by German troops after the fall of Tobruk, he is certain that the "English patient" is responsible for that debacle and is determined to be avenged. The scenes in Tobruk are, after the credit sequence, the high point of "The English Patient." Abrupt, disjointed, frighteningly chaotic, director Anthony Minghella capably provides a sense of the frantic anxiety of a city torn by war. Even more harrowing is Caravaggio's interrogation and torture by a German officer (J¸rgen Prochnow) after the fall of Tobruk, an all-too-convincing evocation of dust, squalor, tedium, pain and blood. Unfortunately, this winner of nine Academy Awards in 1996, including Best Picture, is supposed to be a romance, and at that it singularly fails. Indeed, aside from the occasional flashes of brilliance like those noted above, the film barely registers. Fiennes and Thomas certainly look great together, and all concerned make a serious effort to make this a sexy, sensual, bleakly pessimistic take on existence. But the makers of "The English Patient" seem to be more interested in reducing the dialogue to stylish, opaque shards than in doing anything so vulgar as making us care what happens to these people. (My nominee for scene least likely to ignite a romance occurs early. Thomas asks Fiennes how he came to work in the Sahara. He tells her a nearly incomprehensible story about his first trip to the desert, then finishes it with a lock-jawed, flinty stare forward as if to say "See?" Thomas seems to get it, but I responded "Huh?") The romance between Fiennes and Thomas has to be taken on faith. You don't feel anything yourself, and the more frequently they state their undying love for each other (or rather, fail to state it, for they're never that direct, preferring instead to indulge in weighty parables and monotonous recitations of Greek myths) the more tedious the film becomes. There is a final twist to the story that I won't reveal that is intricately bound up with the Count's secret. It is a measure of the film's failure to engage us imaginatively that when the secret is finally revealed, it barely registers, even though it is central to both the story and the relationship between Fiennes and Thomas. (After nearly three hours of this zoned-out silliness, maybe I was simply too tired to respond.) It is also a measure of the film's academic artiness that instead of responding in awe at the photography and settings, we're more likely to think: "Oh yeah, right, "Lawrence of Arabia." And that looks like "Sheltering Sky."' Northern Europeans (and, to judge by "The English Patient," Canadians) tend to make too much of the desert. They mistake its heat, emptiness and stark simplicity as a refuge for their fantasies, a place where they can let loose and "be themselves" precisely because it is so different from the worlds they know. But as Prince Feisal tries to explain to T.E. Lawrence in "Lawrence of Arabia," "There is nothing in the desert." There's nothing much in "The English Patient" either, except a well worn Romanticism about the bleak expanses and insufferable conditions of a world that any sane person would seek to escape. Tired, self-loathing, incapable of recognizing their sentimentality, these characters project their soulessness on to the landscape and marvel that it's just as empty as they are. In short, "The English Patient" is a film for those who equate art with ponderous obscurity and joylessness with profundity. It is nearly as arid as the Sahara itself with too few oases to make the journey worthwhile.
Image and Sound An early DVD, "The English Patient" would be considerably improved by a new, widescreen enhanced transfer. While the letterboxed image is reasonably well transferred, it inevitably gets a little grainy when blown up for a 16:9 TV. The transfer is fairly bright, high key, relatively low contrast, soft at the edges, competent without being exciting. The sound is crisply professional, but again, nothing spectacular. (The sound engineers almost certainly should not be blamed for Fiennes's frequently unintelligible lines. He may be the most successful mumbler since the early days of Marlon Brando.)
The Extras None
Commentary None
Final Words: Intelligent, uninvolving, more than slightly opaque, the popular and critical success of "The English Patient" is far more interesting than the film itself. Handsomely produced with more than a whiff of pointlessness, the film is clearly the product of people who mistake lack of statement for understatement, obscurity for subtlety, artiness for style. All concerned deserve credit for at least trying to make something a cut above Hollywood's current low standards, but good intentions are never enough. Something as unbearably stuffy and full of itself as "The English Patient" may not be quite enough to make one long for "Austin Powers," but it certainly strains one's patience and is a classic example of what gives "literary cinema" a bad name.


Send all Comments to Teakwood Productions
July 6, 2001