Review Archives

1 | 2 | 3

Today's Date is:

The FURY


Reviewed by: Christopher J. Jarmick
Genre: Horror
Video: Anamorphic 1.85:1
Audio: Dolby Digital 4.0, Dolby Digital 2.0 (Mono)
Language: English, French
Subtitle: English (Captioned), Spanish
Length: 120 minutes
Rating: R
Release Date: 09/04/01
Studio: 20th Century Fox
Commentary: None
Documentaries: None
Featurettes: None
Filmography/Biography: None
Interviews: None
Trailers/TV Spots: The original trailer is presented in 1.85.1 widescreen anamorphic. Five additional trailers for other Fox films are also included most in wide screen as well.
Alternate/Deleted Scenes: None
Music Video: None
Other: There is a still frame archive focusing on lobby cards and posters from around the world.
Cast and Crew: Amy Irving Kirk Douglas, John Cassavetes, Carrie Snodgrass, Charles Durning, Fiona Lewis, Andrew Stevens, Carol Rossen, Joyce Easton, William Finley, Dennis Franz, Michael O'Dwyer, Jame Lambert, Gordon Jump.
Screenplay by: Written by John Farris (based on his novel)
Produced by: Ron Preissman, Frank Yablans
Directed By: Brian De Palma
Music: John Williams
The Review: The Fury (1978) was Brian De Palma's 5.5 million follow-up to his wildly successful Carrie (Carrie's budget was about 1.5 million meaning the Fury was a huge leap for De Palma). It has a lot in common with David Cronenburg's 1981 Scanners and a little bit with the early 1960's features Village of the Damned and Children of the Damned . In both Scanners and The Fury a somewhat omnipotent government agency is involved with people with psychic powers who can read minds and cause people to bleed or worse. De Palma was looking forward to one day filming Alfred Bester's THE DEMOLISHED MAN -- which concerns a telepathic society. He wanted to in effect prepare for the project by doing a film with multiple story lines and one that dealt with telepathic characters. The Fury was brought to De Palma by well-known hands-on producer Frank Yablans. * * * * * * The Fury consists of several set pieces which go in surprising directions (the audience at the time never anticipated ) to deliver a series of pretty violent twists and turns along the way-- Suspense Action Thriller, Science Fiction, Tragic Romance, and Horror.The middle part of the film sags a bit, the comedy is sloppy, the acting varies widely, and the special effects are dated and pretty obvious. The film's story is utterly implausible but is structured and paced in a manner where we realize fairly early on the film is an exercise in style. As it progresses it veers more toward a science fiction and melodramatic horror film. De Palma's weaknesses are in dealing with actors and meshing various acting styles and approaches. This is more apparent in this film where you have several generations and styles of actors converging. * * * * * * The film's set piece construction, pacing, camera movement and music is somewhat reminiscent of Hitchcock, but once again DePalma is experimenting and expanding his visual ideas--not merely paying homage or mimicking Hitchcock. There is a scene on a rooftop in which the camera angle is very similar to one Hitchcock uses in several films including "Saboteur" and "To Catch A Thief". Hitchcock had found the most effective and best angle to film a rooftop fight and Hitch used the angle in several of his films. Since the most effective angle had already been established, De Palma used it because of how well it worked. And as you'll see from the film, it still works very well. * * * * * * * * The film is credited as being written by John Farris and based on his novel, but the way DePalma jumps from scene to scene it's clear he's probably only using pieces of the screenplay. In fact De Palma wanted the film to race 'like a wind up toy' from beginning to end. It is producer Yablans who insisted on having some quieter character moments and De Palma who knew how important contrast was, ultimately agreed. De Palma did not have the luxury of plotting out his storyboards for several months like he did with Carrie. The combination of not having as much lead time to prepare the film and dealing with intertwining story-lines makes for a very episodic feel to the sequences in the film. * * * * * * The film introduces us to three characters that are in the Middle East. Peter Sandza is a government spook of some sort and is very competitive and close to his son Robin (Andrew Stevens) who has some kind of special talent. Peter has worked closely for 20 years with Childress (Cassavetes) . Peter is retiring from the agency, his son Robin is going to a special school in Chicago. The humor and on- location aspects of the scene may remind you of Hitchcock's North by Northwest. As the scene shifts tone in an extremely sudden matter you might think of a film like The French Connection and that's what De Palma was aiming for. Childress and Peter have a drink together to toast their years at the agency . As Childress leaves the table, a group of Arab assassin's suddenly appear and start firing on Peter who manages to narrowly escape but it appears the boat he tries to escape in is blown up. Robin thinks his dad is dead. In the assassination attempt the audience, but not Robin, realizes that Childress is part of the hit. In fact, Peter manages to shoot several bullets into Childress' left arm. He'll later growl that he 'killed the arm'.* * * * * The scene abruptly shifts forward. We aren't quite sure why we are watching the backsides of two girls having a conversation in Chicago, and then see they are being followed by a very strange looking street bum looking fellow (played by Phantom of Paradise's William Finley). Eventually we catch up to what is going on. Our street bum is a detective and psychic who has been hired by Peter (Kirk Douglas) to help him find his son Robin. To do so Peter needs to find another teenager with psychic ability to help him (although this is not explained very well). There's a double cross going on, however. Childress sends his agents to get Peter who in swashbuckler style escapes his hotel room in his underwear. He then holds up a middle aged couple to get some clothes and put on a disguise (the husband is played by the Maytag repairman WKRP actor- Gordon Jump). Peter's disguise doesn't work as Childress' operatives quickly spot him. So Peter hijacks a ride with two of Chicago's finest (one of whom is a very young Dennis Franz who over-acts in wide-eyed buffoon style). During the ride he tries to explain the situation to him and as he does he sound more and more like some conspiracy theory wacko. The scene should have played a little better than it does, but one can't help but notice Franz' ridiculously exaggerated facial expressions. Then we get a fairly exciting and semi-comic chase sequence. Peter barely gets away. * * * * * * * Meanwhile one of the girls we were following turns out to be Gillian (Amy Irving) a teenager from a wealthy family who is a bit of an outcast because she can read people's minds. This creates a problem in school (look fast for a very young Daryl Hannah) which leads to Gillian enrolling in the Paragon Institute which specializes in people with psychic ability. * * * * * There are more wild coincidences, which put Peter and Gillian together and send them on a chase to find Peter's son Robin and of course the ultimate show-down with Childress. It's not particularly believable -- threads that are inadequately explained connect the stories and so we are left with unlikely coincidences to piece it together. If you can overlook this and are in the right frame of mind, the film is exciting, fast paced and very entertaining. Although it has dated in several ways it's also fun to see who shows up in the film (you might spot James Belushi). * * * * * * * Charles Durning who seemed to turn up in every other movie in the late 70's and throughout most of the 1980's has a supporting role playing Dr. Jim Mckeever. There's also Carrie Snodgrass who plays a nurse/secretary at the Paragon Institute and happens to be an old girlfriend of Peter's. * * * * * * The way the story connects people and leapfrogs toward the inevitable showdown between Peter, Gillian, Robin and Childress is creative and requires the viewer to have a very liberal sense of disbelief. * * * * * * * John Cassavettes was almost always fun to watch as an actor and he makes a wonderful heavy here. Kirk Douglas is energetic and radiates some star charisma in a role you wouldn't have been surprised to find Charlton Heston playing. Andrew Stevens as Robin does what is required of him. * * * * * * It is Amy Irving who carries the film. She's got the most screen-time and she gives a very good, believable performance. It's a difficult role for anyone to play but Irving keeps her character believable no matter how silly things tend to get with where the film winds up going. It's probably the best acting she has ever done. * * * * * The film has a memorable over-the-top ending but it is disappointing there isn't an epilogue to better explain what happens to the character of Gillian. Irving's performance makes us care enough about the character we want to know more than what the film offers.* * * * * Throughout the film, De Palma uses the camera at times as if it is a character. It doesn't just give us broad sweeps but actually seems to be breathing within certain scenes, moving slightly to give and then take away different characters' spaces. You'll notice what I mean most in the first half of the film. * * * * * * * De Palma is doing more than what an audience expects of him, particularly an audience that knew De Palma from Carrie. He wanted to give the audience a wild film that offered some gory shocks, but he also wanted to create a visually graceful and inventive film. The John Williams score is very evocative of Bernard Herrman and once again some might believe De Palma is paying homage to or even mimicking Hitchcock rather than doing something very different. Since the film failed both critically and at the box-office one can assume that those expecting another Carrie did not get what they were expecting and those wanting something vastly different than Carrie did not believe De Palma delivered. The film is extremely far-fetched and implausible and pretty gory. The film's failure meant De Palma did not have an easy time of it financing his next film, Dressed to Kill. It is with Dressed to Kill that De Palma smoothed out many of the ideas he shows us in this film to finally create the near perfect blend of Hitchcock influenced style and a modern mixture of sex, gore and thrills that shocked, titillated and even angered audiences and critics. * * * * * *
Image and Sound The Fury is presented in 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen. The DVD represents a vast improvement over previously released videotape versions. The print that has been used is in very good shape, but it does not appear that any extensive digital re-mastering has been performed as there are many noticeable glitches, drop outs, color variations, and grain present. None of this looks terrible, but it is not the kind of pristine presentation you might expect a DVD release of a major name director's work to receive. * * * * The over-all image is a little soft, probably because of the lenses used when the film was originally shot. Some of the blue-screen work however looks extremely obvious.* * * * The Fury's sound is presented in it's original mono and a newly re-mixed 4.0 surround track. It is the only track that is in surround in spite of what the packaging claims. John William's score sound bright and powerful at the beginning of the film. However as the film begins there is a lot of audible noise to be heard and the manner in which sound levels have been artificially boosted and bounced from the channels overemphasis any flaws the original mono source had. This means loud noises are over-modulated or muted and there is a great deal of noise.
The Extras There is very little in the way of extra features on this DVD release. The trailer is presented in anamorphic widescreen. There are several bonus trailers from other Fox films The bonus trailers are for five other Fox films: Alien, The Fly original, The Fly re-make, Lake Placid and the Omen. The Omen trailer is presented in anamorphic widescreen.* * * * * The still frame archive is larger than you would expect on a no-frills type disk. There are several sections that include different sets of posters, and lobby cards from Japan, France, the U.K. and the United States. The Behind the Scenes section has just one photo. What happened?
Commentary None
Final Words:

The Fury is an interesting over-the-top horror film that has many worthwhile visuals and interesting De Palma/ Hitchcock influenced touches. There are excellent performances from Amy Irving, John Cassavetes, Kirk Douglas and others, although some performances are cartoonish and poor. The story is wildly implausible. The film is pretty gory and is not for the squeamish or children. Visually the film is a treat and the DVD is a vast improvement on past presentations of the film--although the sound elements are very inconsistent. There are few extras on the disc. If you are a past fan of the film, it has held up pretty well and you'll probably want to purchase the DVD. If you aren't a fan of the film, I suggest you rent the film to make sure it is your cup of tea before buying it. * * * * * * * *

 

Christopher J. Jarmick, is the author of The Glass Cocoon with Serena F. Holder a critically acclaimed, steamy suspense thriller. For information on Author readings/signings or availability of special autographed editions of the novel email: glasscocoon@hotmail for details.* * * * * * * Original portions of this review Copyright© Christopher J. Jarmick 2001. The above work is protected by international copyright law.


Send all Comments to Teakwood Productions
September 18, 2001