Review Archives

1 | 2 | 3

Today's Date is:

Heavenly Creatures


Reviewed by: David Litton
Genre: Drama
Video: 2.35:1 widescreen
Audio: Dolby 2.0 Surround
Language: English
Subtitle: English
Length: 109 min
Rating: R
Release Date: 09/24/2002
Studio: Miramax Films
Commentary: None
Documentaries: None
Featurettes: None
Filmography/Biography: None
Interviews: None
Trailers/TV Spots: Trailer
Alternate/Deleted Scenes: None
Music Video: None
Other: None
Cast and Crew: Melanie Lynskey, Kate Winslet, Sarah Peirse, Diana Kent, Clive Merrison, Simon O'Connor, Jed Brophy
Screenplay by: Written by: Frances Walsh, Peter Jackson
Produced by: Jim Booth
Directed By: Peter Jackson
Music: Peter Dasent
The Review:

In "Heavenly Creatures," director Peter Jackson takes us into the darkest recesses of the human psyche while simultaneously instilling a deep sense of regret, fear, sadness, and tragedy into his proceedings. His two main characters, based on the lives of two New Zealand teenagers responsible for the death of one's mother, would appear cold, remorseless, and psychotic to the outside world, but by using one girl's diaries as reference material for his unfolding plot, he and co-writer Frances Walsh reveal a much more engrossing matter than that of mere psychopathy. ***

The plot revolves around two misfit teenage girls, Pauline Rieper and Juliet Hulme (Melanie Lynskey and Kate Winslet), who meet when Juliet begins attendance at the Christchurch girl's school where Pauline attends classes. The two girls are instantly drawn to one another, Pauline in admiration of Juliet's unabashed way with words around the teachers, Juliet out of a fantastic scar on Pauline's leg. In the beginning, their friendship is merely out of a need for one another: they fill in the holes in each other's lives that their parents and classmates have no dream of even spotting. ***

Seeing this early sequence of events, it's difficult to register the awful crime of which they were committed and sentenced to five years in prison. Their friendship is carefree, whimsical, enlightening, and gleeful, so much so that they create their own imaginary fantasyland, "The Fourth World" as Juliet comes to call it, where all of nature is in brilliant bloom, and they are free to be themselves. ***

As their bond thickens, things begin to grow tense, both internally and externally. Juliet's sudden bout with tuberculosis splits the two girls apart for many months, during the course of which they write one another in the form of royal lovers. Their bond becomes so fragile during this period that a male love interest for Pauline is seen by Juliet as a wrench in their relationship; Pauline, seeing the pain in her friend's eyes, immediately acknowledges her wrongdoing and remains "faithful." Their parents, whose eyes are ever-watchful, begin to take note of the extreme nature of their daughters' friendship, and suspect that there is more to it than simple girl talk and chatter. ***

The film takes time out of various instances to toss in a rich, texturized undercurrent of homosexual themes throughout the piece, implying that Pauline and Juliet were, in fact, lovers of a sort. It would certainly appear as such, considering their passionate embraces, their not-so-innocent kisses, and their trips into their own private world, where their wildly imaginative story begins to take shape in the form of clay figures and outrageously over-the-top scenery. But there is also a counter-theme that runs parallel to these events, that which focuses on the extreme unease with which their friendship is handled. This stems from the unstable psychological nature of the girls as individuals: they don't see themselves as lesbian lovers as much as they view themselves as normal in regards to their own perspective. The fact that they are always there for one another, becoming fiercely dependent on the support of the other, makes the issues of homosexuality seem secondhand. ***

Jackson and Walsh are careful not to overstep the bounds of characterization with these two fragile beings. It would be easy for one to craft a movie in which the girls are seen as little more than being "stark, raving mad," as Pauline so elegantly puts it; Jackson does not want to do that. Rather than play on the viciousness of the crime, he explores the events that lead up to it, taking on the great challenge of creating a connection between the audience and the two girls, that which brings about a variety of emotions like understanding, sadness, perhaps even sympathy. ***

Even in the end, Jackson remains faithful to this rendering, as seen in his brilliant closing sequence, which juxtaposes their crime with a series of images in the mind's eye of Pauline and Juliet. Pauline is standing on a wharf as a boat departs with Juliet on it; the two see one another, both are crying uncontrollably, and there is such a wave of depression about the scene that almost conjures up tears in one's eye. Theirs was a friendship they thought was worth killing for; it never occured to them that what they thought would end their pain would, in reality, be the dividing wall that would separate them forever. ***

In a film like this, casting is the most essential key; without it, all bets are off. Jackson has found an inspired duo of young actresses who run the gamut of elation and unhappiness; Winslet and Lynskey have such a powerful onscreen presence, be it together or separated, that one becomes instantly mesmerized by their characters. Even in the most extreme situations, our involvement in the events at hand never founders, and that is due to the fact that these two actresses are able to convince us of their characters' mental states without making them seem like outright lunatics. These girls weren't crazy in the general sense of the word: they were crazy about each other, and for them, that was more than enough justification for any wrongdoing they would have to undertake. "Heavenly Creatures" isn't trying to change one's mind about the atrocity of a crime; it merely wants to provide a reason, and does so without flaw.

Image and Sound Not the most striking of transfers, but it does manage to one-up the previous DVD release, which was belabored with a horrible pan-and-scan print of the film. Here, the image is presented in all its 2.35:1 widescreen glory, and the effect is mesmerizing though minorly flawed in places. The overall clarity is well-preserved, with the occasional noise and distraction in some darker scenes. Fleshtones are accurate, and colors warm and inviting, though oversaturated in some places. The sound is sadly only mastered in 2.0 surround, and the rear channels fail to impress, while deep bass is reserved. Dialogue sounds natural, and the score makes itself known.
The Extras A big disappointment, to say the least. Let's hope this one gets a better treatment somewhere down the road.
Commentary None
Final Words: Clearly meant to capitalize on the success of Peter Jackson's "The Lord of the Rings," it's kind of a shame that a movie as brilliant as this isn't given a chance to stand on its own merit. Even still, here's hoping that this wondrous achievement receives a just DVD treatment in the future.


Send all Comments to Teakwood Productions
October 3, 2002