|






|
Review
Archives
1
| 2 | 3
|
|
Today's
Date is:
|
|
Heavy
Metal 2000 - Superbit Collection
|
|
Reviewed
by: |
David
Litton |
| Genre: |
Animation |
| Video: |
1.85:1
anamorphic widescreen |
| Audio: |
English DTS
5.1, English Dolby Digital 5.1 |
| Language: |
English
|
| Subtitle: |
English,
Spanish, Portuguese |
| Length: |
88
min |
| Rating: |
R
|
| Release
Date: |
12/17/2002 |
| Studio: |
Columbia
TriStar |
| Commentary:
|
None |
| Documentaries:
|
None |
| Featurettes:
|
None |
| Filmography/Biography:
|
None |
|
Interviews: |
None |
| Trailers/TV
Spots: |
None |
| Alternate/Deleted
Scenes: |
None |
| Music
Video: |
None |
| Other:
|
None |
| Cast
and Crew: |
Michael Ironside,
Julie Strain, Billy Idol, Pier Kohl, Sonja Ball, Bray Moffatt
|
| Written
By: |
Rboert Payne
Cabeen |
| Produced
by: |
Michel Lemire, Jacques
Pettigrew |
| Directed
By: |
Michael Coldewey,
Michel Lemire |
| Music: |
Frederic
Talgorn |
| The
Review: |
My main complaint with the original
1981 "Heavy Metal" was that the stories were too jumbles and
incoherent, lacking the interest of the morbid visuals. It
seems that the makers of "Heavy Metal 2000" were trying to
address this issue, this time relying on a singular story
that continues throughout the entire film, and using a different
source that its predecessor ("Heavy Metal" was based on a
magazine of the same name; "2000" is based on the graphic
novel The Melting Pot). Now I'm left wondering if the collection
of shorts in the original were really all that bad. ***
Truth be told, the only thing that
truly impressed me about the first film were its visuals,
mainly because they were so ostentatious, so unabashedly graphic,
and so outlandish for their time. The animation world had
yet to see the likes of violence or gratuitous sex in its
realm, and "Heavy Metal," with its depictions of nude females
and gory bloodshed, sullied what was once a sacred safe haven.
With the sequel, we've seen it all before, be it in animation
or live-action filmmaking: nothing about "Heavy Metal 2000"
is shocking or eye-opening. Scenes of battle and fornication
no longer have the shock value that they did when the first
film was released. The fact that the animation itself is spiffier
and sleeker comes off as little more than the simple passage
of time. ***
The story, albeit more coherent
than its predecessor, still lacks interest. With an obligatory
opening voice-over that informs us of a mystical key to the
fountain of immortality, we trudge along the weary plotlines
of madman Tyler (voiced by Michael Ironside), driven insane
after he comes into possession of the key, who plans to return
to the planet housing the fountain of immortality. There is
a completely off-the-wall subplot involving his stop-over
on the planet of Eden, where he rains death and destruction,
and kidnaps the sister and kills the father of Julie (Julie
Strain Eastman), the requisite buxom babe who vows vengeance
and follows Tyler during his exploits. ***
There's not really anything wrong
with the plot in terms of narrative flow: everything moves
along without leaving out anything vital to our understanding
of the story development (I'm still wondering, however, about
that whole Eden scenario, and the film isn't good enough to
explore again to find out). It's just not that interesting,
mainly because we've seen it all before. Betrayal of trust,
misguided loyalties, lame one-liners, and surprise endings
that don't really shock and shake as they should... it all
falls into a specific pattern where the next event is predicted
long before it happens. Case-in-point: in a scene in which
Julie pretends to be "hot" for Tyler, she attempts to kill
him before being interrupted. Since this occurs about halfway
into the film, we know he's not going to die. Why not surprise
us for once? ***
In one instance in the film, one
character remarks, "This really sucks." I had this feeling
more than once while sitting through what can only be described
as a failure on pretty much all levels. The makers of "Heavy
Metal 2000" seem to be stuck in the heyday of the original
film, under the impression that over the last two decades,
cinema has been all about cute-and-cuddly kitty cats and fluffy
animals, and that their movie will set a new benchmark. Not
even close.
|
| Image
and Sound |
After renting the original 2000
DVD release of "Heavy Metal 2000," and comparing it with this
new Superbit release, I came to the conclusion that unless
the film itself is dated, or the previous DVD was one of the
first ever, there's not going to be much of a difference in
the image quality. The 1.85:1 transfer for this new edition
again features nicely-saturated colors that are vibrant and
smooth, accompanied by clear, sharp edges that are grazed
by enhancement artifacts. Shadow detail and contrasts are
well-done. ***
The sound, once again, is aggressively
loud and annoying, and should please any audiophile. The music
is given the top priority here, and fills the room with ear-splitting
sound from all channels, including the impressively-used surrounds,
and the powerful .1 LFE, which is active almost throughout
the entire movie. Sound effects also provide a terrific amount
of energy, while dialogue sounds clean throughout, and isn't
overpowered by the other elements. Of course, the DTS track
exhibits a much more impacting experience, but both tracks
perform admirably.
|
| The
Extras |
None
|
| Commentary |
None
|
| Final
Words: |
Another
worthless Superbit title with sound and picture no better or
worse than its predecessor, and no special features. |
|
|
|