|






|
Review
Archives
1
| 2 | 3
|
|
Today's
Date is:
|
|
Goldeneye
|

|
Reviewed
by: |
Charles
Tashiro |
| Genre: |
action/adventure |
| Video: |
widescreen
enhanced 2.35:1 |
| Audio: |
Dolby
5.1 surround |
| Language: |
English,
French |
| Subtitle: |
English,
French |
| Length: |
2
hours, 10 minutes |
| Rating: |
PG
|
| Release
Date: |
10-19-99 |
| Studio: |
MGM
|
| Commentary:
|
The
commentary by director Martin Campbell and producer Michael
Wilson. |
| Documentaries:
|
"The
World of 007" is a feature-length review of the series up to
the production of "Goldeneye." |
| Featurettes:
|
"The
Goldeneye Video Journal" provides a glimpse into the film's
production. |
| Filmography/Biography:
|
None
|
|
Interviews: |
None,
although both the documentary and featurettes include several
interviews. |
| Trailers/TV
Spots: |
12
|
| Alternate/Deleted
Scenes: |
none
|
| Music
Video: |
Tina
Turner, "Golden Eye" |
| Other:
|
None |
| Cast
and Crew: |
Pierce Brosnan,
Sean Bean, Izabella Sorupco, Famke Janssen, Joe Don Baker, Judi
Dench |
| Screenplay
by: |
Jeffrey Caine;
story by Michael France |
| Produced
by: |
Michael Wilson and Barbara
Broccoli |
| Directed
By: |
Martin Campbell |
| Music: |
Eric Serra |
| The
Review: |
The Bond
series is a reliable commodity, and I put it that way deliberately,
because what is most striking about "Goldeneye," both as film
and DVD, is just how much of a package it is. What matters is
to provide the formula: a sexy actor in the lead, plenty of
gorgeous women, exotic locations, spectacular stunts, clever
gadgets, and so on. You can expect technically proficient filmmaking,
a story compelling enough to hold your attention for two hours,
enough appeal to the adult in you not to feel insulted, but
certainly no challenges to your brain power. Which isn't to
claim that the films are all equally good. Everyone has his
or her favorite installment, and I won't get into the debate
as to who is the "best" Bond. "Goldeneye" is a respectable,
if not terribly imaginative entry that suffers from over-production.
No Bond film was ever cheap, but as the profits from the series
increased and the scale of the productions ballooned, they have
become ever shinier and just a tad off-putting. "Goldeneye"
seems particularly showy, possibly because it was the debut
film for Pierce Brosnan in the role and was the first Bond entry
for several years. No doubt the producers felt they had to give
it their all to reassure audiences that the formula still works.
(It's interesting, for example, how many people in the behind-the-scenes
footage on the DVD refer to the need to make Bond contemporary,
as if all involved felt a little defensive about keeping him
alive.) As with most of the Bond films, "Goldeneye's" story
is almost incidental. This time around, Bond is up against a
renegade British agent and a bunch of post-Soviet Russians trying
to blackmail the world with a space weapon that can destroy
us all with the flick of a button. That's the excuse; the *purpose*
of the filmmaking is perhaps best conveyed by the arrival of
the "Bond car," this time a BMW Z3. The film introduced the
car to American audiences, and it serves absolutely no function
in the story, except as the excuse for an elaborate, thoroughly
gratuitous stunt (Bond's American ally, Joe Don Baker, lands
a plane over the car as he drives it). Once introduced, it never
appears again, and for that matter, Baker doesn't do much either.
As far as I know, this is the most explicit the series has ever
gotten in its merchandising tie-ins. It's a symptom of what's
gone wrong with the series (and big budget filmmaking generally)
that an entire scene was included just to sell a new toy. It
manages to give the whole film the air of a two-hour plus BMW
commercial. Sean Bean makes a respectable villain as Bad Boy
agent 006, Alec Trevalyan. Famke Janssen makes the most of villainess
Xenia Onatopp, Judi Dench is a good choice as the grim, tight-lipped
new M, and Brosnan acquits himself respectably. (He at least
has a sense of how to deliver the film's rather tired witticisms.)
It's all smartly put together, and the DVD reflects the care
put into the production of the film, with a stunningly clear
transfer and one of the most elaborate menus I've ever seen.
Still, one can be forgiven feeling that it's all a tad pointless,
with the elaborate production a substitute for substance. There
is a problem with formula filmmaking (and no matter how high
profile the Bond series may have become, it's almost the classic
instance of milking a successful formula till it's dry). The
filmmakers have to do a delicate balancing act. On the one hand,
they have to deliver the goods the audience expects. At the
same time, they have to keep one step ahead of the our jadedness.
"Goldeneye" accomplishes this feat with shiny new wrappings,
a breakneck pace, more explosions than would seem possible to
include in a single movie other than a war film, lots of shifts
in location, expensive clothes, immaculate photography and all
the usual tricks of basically empty filmmaking. It's not a bad
movie, or even a bad Bond, but no one seems to have asked whether
they might not have been better off just re-thinking the whole
thing and starting over, particularly with every other movie
on the block doing much the same thing. |
| Image
and Sound |
Both picture
and sound have been given extreme care and attention. At a technical
level, this disc is hard to beat, which is only appropriate
given the qualities of the movie itself. |
| The
Extras |
"The World
of 007" is a feature-length review of the series up to the production
of "Goldeneye." It provides a host of excerpts from films, interviews
with actors, technicians and stunt people from throughout the
series. In no sense critical--it was obviously created as a
promotion for the release of "Goldeneye"--it nonetheless provides
a nice synoptic history of the series up to that point as well
as a reasonably good explanation of its popularity. Many of
the actors interviewed provide fascinating anecdotes. My personal
favorite is Roger Moore's unabashed admission that he was perfectly
happy not to perform one stunt in "Live and Let Die," followed
by a story from the film's stunt coordinator explaining why
it was just as well he didn't. The section on stunts, in fact,
is probably the most interesting for those wanting to know about
production of the series, even though it is rather short compared
to other portions of the documentary. featurettes: "The Goldeneye
Video Journal" provides a glimpse into the film's production,
including interviews with Pierce Brosnan and director Martin
Campbell. The most interesting section involves a detailed look
at the production of the opening stunt, as Bond dives from the
heights of a dam. There are also some nice, small details that
go by almost in passing, such as the background extras in one
scene miming their way through a song as the principles play
out their dialogue. The featurette is a little short, and it
ends abruptly, but many of the ingredients provide a real, nitty-gritty
sense of production. (There is a second, promotional featurette
which is far less interesting, although it does contain the
best single description of the film. In an interview, Brosnan
describes "Goldeneye" as a romp, and that pretty accurately
sums it up.) |
| Commentary |
The commentary
by director Martin Campbell and producer Michael Wilson was
obviously recorded as the two sat watching the film. Rich with
anecdotes and details about production, it nonetheless (unsurprisingly)
does not provide much insight into the film itself. The upside
of having production personnel perform these second soundtracks
is the background information it can provide. The downside is
that the commentary doesn't reveal much about the films' importance
or its' place in film history. It's nice to know how particular
effects were produced, or that the Bond Aston Martin was borrowed
and had to be repaired when an accident occurred, and so on
and so on. That tells us a lot about how the film was made.
A commentary by a critic or historian, on the other hand, might
help us to understand the film's significance in the series,
where it adheres to the formula or deviates from it. Fortunately,
both Campbell and Wilson perform their task unselfconsciously,
with a good sense of how to connect to the listener. |
| Final
Words: |
One would
be hard put to come up with a more carefully executed, feature-packed
DVD than "Goldeneye." Crafted with loving care and respect for
the Bond series, the disc is obviously the work of people dedicated
to providing a rich assortment of treats to motivate repeated
viewing. It is nonetheless a symptom of the film's weakness
that those repeat viewings are likely to be motivated less by
a desire to watch the film again than to listen to the director's
comments or learn a bit more about the series. Both disc and
film are triumphs of technology, glossy, expertly produced,
but also ultimately rather forgettable. |
|
|
|