|
|
|
Search Movie Review
Archives
|
|
|
| |
| Dvdivas
was founded by John Gabbard in 2000. It's purpose has been and
remains to be to provide you, the entertainment community with
the latest dvds and movie reviews. It will continue to be your
link to the most popular dvd movies. |
|
|
“The
Perfect Score”
|
 |
Reviewed
by: |
Wayne A. Klein |
| Genre: |
Comedy |
| Video: |
1.85:1 Anamorphic
Widescreen |
| Audio: |
Dolby Digital
Surround 2.0 (mono) |
| Languages |
English |
| Subtitles |
English |
| Length |
92 minutes
|
| Rating |
PG-13 for
drug references, language, sexual content |
| Release Date |
7/20/04 |
| Studio |
Paramount
|
| Commentary:
|
Brian Robbins,
and Mark Schwahn |
| Documentaries:
|
None |
| Featurettes:
|
“Making of” featurette |
| Filmography/Biography:
|
None |
|
Interviews: |
None |
| Trailers/TV
Spots: |
Trailer, previews |
| Alternate/Deleted
Scenes: |
None |
| Music
Video: |
None |
| Other:
|
None |
| Cast
and Crew: |
Erika Christensen,
Chris Evans, Bryan Greenberg, Scarlett Johansson, Darius Miles,
Leonardo Nam |
| Written
By: |
Mark Schwahn
and Mark Hyman & Jon Zack |
| Produced
By: |
Roger Birnbaum,
Jonathan Glickman, Brian Robbins, Mike Tollin |
| Directed
By: |
Brian Robbins |
| Music:
|
John Murphy
|
| The
Review: |
The S.A.T.’s must be much more difficult
than I remember them. After all, how many kids would rather
put all their effort into finding a way to steal the test
vs. actually studying for it? Ah, logic is the bane of entertainment’s
existence. If not for the admirable and fun performances of
Leonardo Nam and Scarlett Johansson (“Lost in Translation”)
this MTV production would rank in the bottom third of S.A.T.
scores for intelligence and aptitude. The plot is fairly simple—a
bunch of teens discover that the colleges of their dreams
will elude them unless they score exceedingly well on the
S.A.T. Some of them choked on the test while others just scrapped
the bottom of the necessary scores. So they team up to figure
out a way to break into the building where the exam answers
are kept and steal them so they can cheat on the test. So
cheating is O.K. but studying (because the test is biased
and stacked against those who deserve to do better on them)
isn’t. So much for living up to the values of our nation I
suppose all's fair in commerce and this film is about doing
business, not creating art. It’s an entertaining flick and
about as memorable as a hot dog at a ballpark game. The film’s
saving grace happens to be a very good cast and fidgety direction
that prevents you from realizing how implausible this film
really is. ---
|
| Image
and Sound: |
This transfer
scores 1600 on the S.A.T. Picture quality remains sharp throughout
the movie and there’s little in the way of digital blemishes.
The transfer remains true to the original theatrical version
with lively colors. The sound also benefits from a top notch
transfer with only a slight issue with compression during more
active sequences of the film. --- |
| The
Extras: |
No extra
credit here. We get a brief standard “Making of” featurette
that isn’t bad just pedestrian. As far as any other extras
this is a pretty thin disc. Then again, the material doesn’t
really demand a whole lot in the way of extras as it isn’t
a special effects extravaganza nor is it a deep movie with
a lot of historical references. We do get the theatrical trailer
and, as with all Paramount releases, we get previews.
|
| Commentary:
|
Director
Robbins and writer Schwahn vie for our attention on the commentary
track. Again, this isn’t a deep movie just fun so most of the
information falls into the trivia department: the difficulty
in shooting this scene; why we had to cut that scene; changes
we made before it was released; why the cast look like their
costumes came from a rummage sale. You get the picture. It’s
actually a pretty decent commentary track. --- Final Words:
“The Perfect Score” won’t make any points for |
| Final
Words: |
“The Perfect
Score” won’t make any points for deep, thoughtful observations
but it does prove to be entertaining for its two hours despite
some significant shortcomings in the script. The performances
particularly by Nam and Johansson highlight this film. It’s
another teen exploitation flick and, as such, does have its
moments of crude humor, language and sexual situations. There’s
also reference to smoking pot made in the movie so another demerit
if you’re a parent. I’m sure MTV (the company behind the movie)
was trying to be hip but I’m also sure that the film could have
been just as entertaining without all the things I mentioned |
|
|