Review Archives

1 | 2 | 3

Today's Date is:

Pollock


Reviewed by: Christopher J. Jarmick
Genre: Drama-Biography
Video: Anamorphic 1.85:1 Widescreen
Audio: Dolby Digital 5.0, Dolby Digital 2.0
Language: English
Subtitle: English (Captions Only), French, Spanish
Length: 122 minutes
Rating: R
Release Date: 07/24/01
Studio: Columbia Tristar
Commentary: Director and Star Ed Harris feature length commentary is full of compelling film-making insights.
Documentaries: Making of Pollock documentary
Featurettes: The Making Of Pollock is more insightful and less purely promotional than most Making Of featurettes.
Filmography/Biography: Selected Filmographies of the principal players included
Interviews: Aired interview with P.B.S.'s Charlie Rose included.
Trailers/TV Spots: Theatrical trailer for Pollock and also 32 Short Films about Glenn Gould included
Alternate/Deleted Scenes: A handful of deleted scenes inclued.
Music Video: None
Other: None
Cast and Crew: Ed Harris, Marcia Gay Harden,. Amy Madigan, Jennifer Connelly, Jeffrey Tambor, John Heard, Bud Cort, Val Kilmer
Screenplay by: Written by by Barbara Turner and Susan J. Emshwiller. Based on the book Jackson Pollock: An American Saga by Steven Naifeh and Gregory White Smith
Produced by: Joseph Allen (II), Fred Berner, Peter Brant, Ed Harris, John Kilik (II),Cecilia Kate Roque
Directed By: Ed Harris
Music: Jeff Beal, Tom Waits
The Review: Pollock may not be a film that is at the top of your must see list. Perhaps if you're a big fan of Ed Harris, interested in Jackson Pollock or actually remember that Marcia Gay Harden deservedly won a best supporting actress for her role here you'll be getting a copy of this as soon as possible. * * * When I assure you the film is a focused, uncompromising and rather bleak film about an alcoholic with lots of inner demons who becomes a celebrated artist but never finds true happiness of satisfaction, you'll probably start thinking that sounds pretty much what you thought the film would be like. It's a very familiar sounding kind of film that's been done many times before, it's depressing and you can easily pass on it. * * * Well before you skip the film let me tell you that is full of wonderful performances and it really doesn't make a single false step under Harris' remarkable, seamless, and confident directorial debut. It was Ed Harris project of love. He was told by his father he resembled Jackson Pollock, received and read a book on the famous artist as a gift and decided he would someday make a film about it. It's taken him 15 years to do it. And the film is full of rather familiar material which Harris refuses to pump up by over-stylish or arty. He's telling a true story. The film is, what it is. * * * * * * What it is, is a fairly simple straightforward biography with some truly remarkable moments and some brilliant performances. Ed Harris and Marcia Gay Harden deliver rich full performances as Jackson Pollock and Lee Krasner. Some famous and recognizable faces like Val Kilmer (as Willem de Kooning), Amy Madigan (as Peggy Guggenheim)Jeffrey Tambor (as famed art critic Clement Greenberg), John Heard (as Tony Smith) and Jennifer Connelly (as Ruth Klingman) show up in supporting roles. In one of the most delightful casting choices, Bud Court appears in a few scenes as a Howard Putzel companion of fellow art patron Peggy Guggenheim. He manages to steal a couple of moments in the film to call his own. * * * The film however belongs to Harris and Harden as Pollock and Krasner who help us understand what makes a unique, troubled relationship like theirs tick. * * * The film opens on an almost surreal scene in which a woman clutching a Life Magazine article about Jackson Pollock to her bosom, moves through a crowd to get Pollock's autograph. Pollock's look as he autographs the article is not one of a man who is enjoying his popularity and the attention, but one of a man who isn't sure what he should feel. He is worried that he feels almost nothing. Is he doomed? * * * We flash-back nine years to Greenwich Village, New York City circa 1941 and meet the alcoholic, manic depressive Jackson who is literally being carried home by his brother. He's on the verge of being discovered as an artistic talent, but has worn out his welcome with his sister-in-law who is pregnant and wants her husband to take on the responsibility of his own family and stop partying with his brother the half-crazed artist. * * * Good thing, Lee Krasner takes an interest in Jackson and is intrigued with more than just his art. She gives him the suggestion to come see her and although it takes him three weeks to do so, they begin a rocky romance in which Krasner becomes his number one fan, promoter, muse, and eventually his wife. They move out of Greenwich Village and Pollock becomes temporarily sober, finds his true artistic style, and tastes some degree of fulfillment and happiness, before it all turns sour again. * * * The film is made up of one wonderfully constructed and acted scene after another. They may be somewhat familiar, but there's a an authenticity to all of these scenes few films capture. The film's highlights are those scenes in which we watch Harris as Pollock discover his drip and controlled splash method of painting. These aren't overly stylized scenes like the ones you might have seen depicting Nick Nolte maniacally painting a canvas ( in Martin Scorcese's contribution to the film New York Stories), but a realistic depiction of , not merely a half-crazed possessed creative process, but a creative process that is methodical, almost precise, purposeful and not made by accident. Everyone will understand the phrase a WORK of art much more clearly after watching this film. Harris isn't an actor at all during these scenes, he has completely become Jackson Pollock and we completely believe we are watching an artist at work, not an actor pretending to be an artist at work. In the work of making his art, at least at times, Jackson was free from his inner demons, and life pressures. He was in his groove as a unique artist when he meticulously created his splashes drips and textures of color that become his most celebrated contribution to modern art. It is during these creative scenes when the film comes to a vibrant, magical life. It positively crackles not with a manic energy but one of excitement, discovery and creativity. A little later on, Jackson Pollock paints for a documentary film-maker. He must stop painting when the film-maker runs out of film. He is asked to paint on glass so the film-maker can film through the glass as he paints. Jackson realizes he is capable of prostituting his own creativity and art. The demons are back and he returns to his familiar self- loathing alcoholic ways with a vengeance. It will destroy his relationship completely with Krasner and ultimately end his life in a tragic car accident. * * * Toward the end, like Pollock himself, the film seems to lose some of it's energy. Pollock rarely feels the magic of his creativity. This is done on purpose and it's a risky choice that pays off for director Harris and the film. Pollock lost his grasp on his art, his love and muse and then his own life. And the film shows us how empty, lost and unfulfilled Jackson Pollock felt at the end of his life. * * * Several scenes in the film are breathe and are full of empty space that is not filled with fast edits or background music telling you how you should feel. At other times the film uses background music to good effect. The film isn't stylized for the sake of being stylized and Harris doesn't make the film easier or more enjoyable to watch by adding elements to please or placate the audience. * * * Ed Harris' and Marcia Gay Harden's performances are praiseworthy, and most of us respect people who achieve their goals because of dogged persistence and hard work like Ed Harris has done in making this film. He commissioned a screenplay of the 1989 book that inspired him to make the film : Jackson Pollock: An American Saga by Steven Naifeh and Gregory White Smith. * * * The fact the film doesn't make a false step, contains a few truly magical and memorable scenes and takes chances which might be too subtle for most to notice makes it a film I will be revisiting and possibly putting very high on my own personal top films of all time list in the near future. It also means that those who admire the film to some degree will undoubtedly claim the film is too reverential of its subject to try something wild and stylistic. Harris should have been more passionate and crazed not just with his performance but in his film-making. I think it would have been too easy to create an opera out of Pollock's life and it was much more challenging and honest to do exactly what screenwriters: Barbara Turner and Susan J. Emshwiller, and Harris have done with the film. * * * Little moments are perfectly realized by the actors throughout the film. How Pollock at one point passes his hands over one of Krasden's paintings to help him determine if he likes it or not. Some of those perfect line readings where actors capture more than just a line of dialogue. There's a couple of moments captured by Bud Court (one of them occurs when he is simply bursting at the seams to let Pollock know some very good news and restrains himself for just a moment till the good new just explodes out of his mouth), there's at least one by Amy Madigan, Jeffrey Tambor and several by Ed Harris and Marcia Gay Harden. Harris remarkably is able to capture a look of childlike fraility one moment and then be selfishly utterly lost in his own thoughts the next. I can't say there are many films I eagerly anticipate being able to watch again. This is one of those films. And it's not because the material is dense, but because the performances are so rich. There's also several subtle comic moments sprinkled throughout the film which I relish the though of appreciating and savoring sometime in the future again. * * * Christopher Jarmick,is the author of The Glass Cocoon with Serena F. Holder a steamy suspense thriller which is now available (glasscocoon@hotmail for details). * * * * Original portions of this review Copyright© Christopher J. Jarmick 2001. The above work is protected by international copyright law.
Image and Sound Visually the film is presented in anamorphic widescreen . The transfer quality is top rate with few notable blemishes or distortions of any kind. The black levels are strong throughout and as we switch from bightly lit outdoor scenes to darker indoor shots there seemed to be no noticeable problems presentation on this DVD. Colors are not only bright and strong but vibrant without being oversaturated and I did not notice any bleeding. I also did not notice any compression artifacting during the film. * * * Two audio tracks include the 2.0 Dolby Digital track and a 5.0 channel Dolby Digital track. Even without the LFE (bass) track (as in Dolby 5.1 tracks) the mix is full bodied and rich at all times without any noticable surface noise or distortion of any kind. The full spectrum is used very subtly throughout the film and is quietly impressive.
The Extras The "MAKING OF POLLOCK " featurette is full of interesting details and is not your typical puff piece serving as a long form commercial for the film. It shows us with some detail how Harris 'faked' the intense painting scenes, how he picked his cast and several of the decisions and choices he made. It has some of the same information as the commentary track does but at 20 minutes is a nice concise way to learn a lot about how this film was made. * * * * * The ED HARRIS INTERVIEW from the P.B.S. Charlie Rose show is about 20 minutes long and features Ed Harris being inverviewed by Charlie Rose and discussing not only the film but Harris' intense interest in Pollock and art. It's one of Rose's better interviews and offers some valuable insights into the making of the film and Harris.* * * * There are Four DELETED SCENES which were taken from work prints of the film and so are in pretty mediocre shape. One of these scenes is truly a wonderful addition to the DVD as it shows an extended sequence that adds some depth and understanding to the relationship Pollock had with muse, enabler, and wife Lee Krasner. * * * *
Commentary The feature length commentary track by Ed Harris is full of insightful information. Harris is a bit too dry and on the dull side to listen to but if you are interesting in the process of film-making, and/or Harris this is one of the better commentary tracks you'll come across.
Final Words: Dramatically Pollack is familiar stuff, but is based on a true story. There's not enough unique about the film's story or style, but there are a couple of truly remarkable sequences and several performances to more than make it worth your time. If you are even slightly interested in Jackson Pollack, or Ed Harris or Marcia Gay Harden's Oscar winning performance you should put this film on the top of your must see list. On the other hand, if the films you like, have to be to be loud, obnoxious roller coaster rides with lots of things blowing up. . . skip this one- you'll hate it. * * * * * * Christopher Jarmick,is the author of The Glass Cocoon with Serena F. Holder a critically acclaimed, steamy suspense thriller. For information on Author readings/signings or availability of special autographed editions of the novel email: glasscocoon@hotmail for details. * * *


Send all Comments to Teakwood Productions
July 27, 2001