|






|
Review
Archives
1
| 2 | 3
|
|
Today's
Date is:
|
|
They
|

|
Reviewed
by: |
David
Litton |
| Genre: |
Horror
|
| Video: |
2.35:1
anamorphic widescreen |
| Audio: |
English Dolby
Digital 5.1 |
| Language: |
English
|
| Subtitle: |
English
|
| Length: |
90
min |
| Rating: |
PG-13
|
| Release
Date: |
06/10/2003
|
| Studio: |
Buena
Vista Home Entertainment |
| Commentary:
|
None |
| Documentaries:
|
None |
| Featurettes:
|
None |
| Filmography/Biography:
|
None |
|
Interviews: |
None |
| Trailers/TV
Spots: |
Theatrical trailers |
| Alternate/Deleted
Scenes: |
Alternate
ending Music Video: None |
| Music
Video: |
None |
| Other:
|
None |
| Cast
and Crew: |
Laura Regan,
Marc Blucas, Ethan Embry, Dagmara Dominczyk |
| Written
By: |
Brendan William
Hood |
| Produced
by: |
Scott Kroopf, Tom Engelman
|
| Directed
By: |
Robert Harmon
|
| Music: |
Elia Cmiral |
| The
Review: |
"This is getting ridiculous" exclaims
one of the characters in "They," and damned if I didn't agree
with her completely. In what is becoming a long line of failed
horror films that bear the moniker "Wes Craven Presents,"
this most recent production fails not only as a horror film,
but as a theatrical release. The lofty production values and
eerie setting cannot mask the blatantly trashy acting and
direct-to-video standards that make up this story about a
group of twentysomethings who discover that their childhood
nightmares may not have been nightmares at all, but a reality.
That is so "Nightmare on Elm Street," I could vomit just rehashing
the plot, but I'll risk it. ***
When grad school student Julie
(Laura Regan) witnesses first-hand the suicide of an old friend,
she is left with a simple warning: "They hide in the dark."
But who's "they?" Could it be that the monsters that hide
under the bed and in the closet were actually there, tagging
their victims with sensors of a sort so as to reclaim them
at a later date? That's precisely what Julie sets out to uncover
as she becomes acquainted with others (Ethan Embry, Dagmara
Dominczyk) who share similar experiences, those who one-by-one
get knocked off the old-school way. Very old, actually. ***
Dumb? Doesn't even come close. Let's
try another word: deplorable. Or how about abominable? Or
maybe turgid? Tepid? Redundant? Absurd? Or just plain ridiculous,
as the film so bluntly put it? It's a bad sign when characters
in the horror genre try to contemplate their situation in
intellectual terms; it's even worse when the actors lack the
credibility to make it sound passably entertaining. Regan
lacks any and all spark as an actress here, and her co-stars
suffer a similar fate. Not once is there a moment where the
cast is able to make us care, nor do the filmmakers have the
know-how and the ability to keep our attention with an apparent
less-is-more approach that only leaves us parched and unsatisfied.
***
And you could deal with that, if
only- okay, I can deal with the occasional routine subplot,
the inevitably bad acting, the easily-foreseen attempts to
build up the suspense, but when a horror movie fails at its
most basic and primal objective- to scare- that is simply
something that cannot be tolerated. There is nothing within
the confines of this grueling nightmare of an experience that
even provides it audience with the slightest ounce of tension
or unease: it's inability to generate any measurable thrills
sets it apart from other schlock mongers like 2003's "Darkness
Falls," which was equally trite but ultimately enjoyable because
it cared enough to at least resort to the generic in order
to please, if only marginally. "They" lacks the wisdom of
those that came before it, and as a result quickly fades from
memory.
|
| Image
and Sound |
The movie
may be trash, but the transfer here is a gem. The film's 2.35:1
aspect ratio has been anamorphically enhanced and looks simply
terrific here, awash with lots of atmospheric color saturation
that is muted in some scenes and bursting in others. There
is no bleeding apparent, and fleshtones remain accurate throughout.
The dark appearance of the film makes room for lots of contrast
errors, thankfully none of which can be found here, save for
the occasional lapse in the otherwise great shadow detail.
Edges are generally very good, with some places appearing
somewhat soft; this might be a stylistic effect, but who's
to say, really? (Now calling all twelve citizens who caught
"They" in theaters!) There are some signs of enhancement halos,
but aside from that, this is a nice-looking transfer that
should please. ***
As is requisite
for a horror movie, the sound is the real dazzler, with loads
of slimy sound effects coming from all sides, and lots of
big jumps on the soundtrack. The Dolby Digital 5.1 audio track
faithfully recreates this mood with a clean-sounding presentation
that makes full use of the entire soundfield. Surrounds are
excellent throughout, and while the music does tend to have
a forward lean to it, the effects of creatures and atmosphere
are always present from behind. Dialogue sounds natural, and
deep bass from the .1 LFE, although relatively less active
than on other tracks of its kind, doesn't fail to engage.
If sound is your fetish, this one should get the job done.
|
| The
Extras |
"They"
is getting a near-bare-bones treatment, with only an alternate
ending and some promotional trailers. The new scene, while failing
to make the movie any better or worse, does manage to be more
intelligent than the whole of the finished product, with a new
twist on the story that might have worked better than the ending
we're left with in the final cut. |
| Commentary |
None
|
| Final
Words: |
It
came, it went, it virtually disappeared, and Dimension doesn't
seem too keen on the possibility of a resurrected success with
a home video release. |
|
|
|